The impact takes seconds. So does the damage review.
From extracting the damage line items to litigation: DEPLAW determines the available settlement options, pursues claims automatically via workflow, and rebuts reductions with locally relevant case law — for third-party liability, comprehensive cover and fee claims.
Who it’s for
Law firms practicing traffic law, leasing companies, car dealerships, large appraiser networks and fleets — with full integration into existing systems.
The starting point
Every damage line item needs its own review — and every reduction needs the right case law.
Settlement complexity
Total loss, the “130% rule”, loss-of-use compensation, expert’s fees — each line item has its own requirements.
Regional case law
Insurers’ reductions can only be successfully rebutted with the case law that actually applies at the competent court.
Volume
Leasing companies, car dealerships and fleets generate case numbers that barely stay economical to handle individually.
What DEPLAW delivers in traffic law
From the damage line item to an enforced judgment.
Automatically extract damage line items
Total loss, the “130% rule” and other settlement options are determined directly from the file — for both third-party liability and comprehensive cover alike.
via AI data extraction in the case-file context
Pursue claims automatically
Workflows enforce claims from third-party liability, comprehensive cover and fee claims automatically — modeled once, reusable for every further case.
via BPMN workflow editor
Rebut reductions with local case law
On a reduction or disputed liability, DEPLAW identifies the case law that applies at the competent court and brings it directly into the rebuttal — for the best possible enforcement outcomes.
via local case-law database
Vertical integration into litigation
On a reduction or disputed liability, the case escalates straight into litigation via the native beA interface — with no system break.
via beA interface
Multi-LLM file review: Investigation files are read and summarized in a GDPR-compliant way — the results feed directly into claim letters or statements of claim, instead of sitting alongside as a separate report.
Example · an incoming motor-vehicle accident claim
A modeled process — from the loss notification to the rebuttal.
Adapts to your system landscape
Related topic: recourse review for insurers? SeeAI-powered recourse review for insurers.
A reduction can only be rebutted with the case law that actually counts at the competent court — anything else is wasted time.
Legal Data Technology · Law-firm projects in traffic law
Frequently Asked Questions
What traffic-law firms clarify upfront.
DEPLAW identifies the case law that actually applies at the competent court and brings it directly into the rebuttal of a reduction — instead of a generic, nationwide line of argument.
Yes. The available settlement options are determined directly from the file via AI data extraction — for both third-party liability and comprehensive cover claims alike.
Yes. Investigation files are read and summarized in a GDPR-compliant way, and the results feed directly into claim letters or statements of claim.
Via the native beA interface, the case is handed straight into litigation on a reduction or disputed liability — with no system break and no manual export.
Automate your traffic law cases.
We’ll use a real damage case to show how DEPLAW handles it end to end.
Book a demo